{"id":33925,"date":"2020-04-09T08:55:13","date_gmt":"2020-04-09T08:55:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.bgs.ac.uk\/?p=33925"},"modified":"2024-02-27T11:50:51","modified_gmt":"2024-02-27T11:50:51","slug":"scientists-report-drop-in-earths-movement-amid-coronavirus-lockdown","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bgs.ac.uk\/news\/scientists-report-drop-in-earths-movement-amid-coronavirus-lockdown\/","title":{"rendered":"Scientists report drop in Earth\u2019s movement amid coronavirus lockdown"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n

Seismologists across Europe have been looking at the effects of the coronavirus lockdown on seismic activity after a study in Brussels reported a drop in ambient seismic noise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thomas Lecocq, a seismologist at the Royal Observatory in Belgium, discovered that levels had fallen between 30 and 50 per cent since the middle of last month, which coincides with the country closing schools and businesses as part of the lockdown.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now seismologists around the world have begun a collaborative effort to study this in more detail. The effect has been observed in the UK too.<\/p>\n\n\n

\"RMS<\/a>
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\"Information\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t

RMS Noise (% change) earthquakes map.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t

\"Expand<\/a><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\"Speech\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

We measure ground vibrations from earthquakes using seismometers. These are incredibly sensitive so they also pick up other sources of vibration too, including human activity, such as road traffic, machinery and even people walking past. All these things generate vibrations that propagate as seismic waves through the Earth.<\/p>\n

We compared the average daytime noise levels at seismic stations in the UK in the two week period since the start of the COVID-19 lockdown with the average noise levels for the beginning of the year. The results show reductions in noise levels at most of our stations of between 10 and 50 per cent.<\/p>\n

Brian Baptie, BGS Seismologist.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/blockquote>\n\t\t\t\n\n\n

Scientists say the reduction in seismic noise may help them to see signals from earthquakes that are normally buried in the noise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In theory, this reduction in noise should help scientists to detect more earthquakes in the UK, in Europe and all around the world, according to Dr Baptie.<\/p>\n\n\n\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\"Speech\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

This might help us detect smaller earthquakes and also see low amplitude parts of the ground motions caused by larger earthquakes.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s important to understand that there hasn’t been any change to underlying earthquake activity. Also, this effect is temporary as the background noise levels will rise again when things get back to normal.<\/p>\n

Brian Baptie.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/blockquote>\n\t\t\t\n\n\n

City-based detectors, or those closest to urban centres are most likely to see the biggest improvements recording locations of earthquakes and aftershocks.<\/p>\n\n\n\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\"Speech\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

We would expect those sensors that are closest to sources of human generated noise to show the biggest improvement, while those that are already in quiet rural areas may not change to so much.<\/p>\n

That means that city-based detectors will get better.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Brian Baptie.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/blockquote>\n\t\t\t\n\n\n

For now, scientists are excited by the prospect of being able to get more specific data from the recordings thanks to greater sensitivity.<\/p>\n\n\n\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\"Speech\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

It will be exciting to see what difference this temporary improvement in signal to noise ratios might make.<\/p>\n

In theory, it could lead to insights for geoscience, since much of our understanding about the internal structure of the Earth comes from observations of earthquakes. However, this generally relies on observations over long periods of time, whereas the window of time where our detection capability might be improved is likely to be relatively short.<\/p>\n

Brian Baptie.<\/strong><\/p>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/blockquote>\n\t\t\t\n\n\n

Find out more about how the BGS collects data to improve our understanding of earthquake hazards<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t